You are probably right, but it's a war-saving strategy that assumes we've already lost the battle. How sad.
De, there's another hearing on Dec. 19th. See below from cnn.com. (puke)
".....The temporary restraining order is effective nationwide and will remain in effect until December 19, when the judge has scheduled another hearing, or further order of the court......"
I wouldn't go into that hearing without an attorney.
(maybe even a hundred attorneys, and I don't care for that profession very much)
=================
What really needs to be done is to stop the invasion from happening in the first place. The illegals must be prevented from entering the country at any cost - because then the courts start granting them rights.
On this we agree. It is an invasion, and even the Mayor of Tijuana agreed with the Donald. They can't cope with the onslaught - I never thought they could. They're inept, imo.
Yup, let's stop the invasion. Once they get in, they'll scatter and start applying for their bennies.
The court did just grant them some rights by issuing a temporary restraining order. The ACLU is overjoyed and imo, anti-American. We cannot let this happen.
--------------------
You hit it on the head in one of your earlier posts when you said we should shoot at or above the illegals as they try to enter. I, personally, would have no problem with that.
I believe that was micro who posted that. I love our resident Marines. Regardless, I may have c/p his idea, but it was his idea. He suggested shooting in the sand right in front of the migrants. Of course, I agreed. I applaud that.
Unfortunately, too many Republicans lack the stomach to do what must be done to save the country.
All that needs to be done is to get a boatload of pre-menstral women with AK-47's, and the deal is done. LOL. What is wrong with the Republicans anyway?
We win an election, flipping all 3 branches and we are taking orders from the libtardos? I don't think so, yet we have watched it with our own eyes. Paul Ryan = adios, baby. Boner is making a ton with his MaryJane, maybe you will join him. Somebody has to pay for the WALL AROUND YOUR house.
"Lining up the attorneys," then, is what we need to do after they've already gotten in. That might work, but I'm not at all confident of it. Too much of the swamp seems to be on their side. In fact, I've long thought that attorneys are the swamp. Most of it, anyway.
Trump needs the attorneys before Dec. 19th. That was what I was referring to regarding his/our need for attorneys. Nope, not after the migrants get in, as then it's too late, imo.
We have a 50/50 split on how to handle this. The pro-immigrants were anti-immigrant when "O" was the Prez.
Now they have jumped sides, and so has the Right.
---------------
De, this is going to end up in the 9th circuit and you and I both know the end result of that.
"..........it is a victory for the American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center and other groups who argued it is illegal to block someone based on how they entered the country...."
The ACLU is very powerful, as much as we hate to admit it. Oh yeah, and made up of ALL ATTORNEYS, so fighting "fire with fire" (attorney versus attorney) is the only way to proceed, imo.
I am majorly ticked off about this, and not much else rises to this threat, at the moment. However, if Korea nukes us, immigration might have to come in second, lol.
=================
HE IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE OPINIONS OF HOLLYWEIRD, THE LIBTARDOS OR ANYONE ELSE.
What happened to this:
"As the Supreme Court affirmed this summer, Congress has given the President broad authority to limit or even stop the entry of aliens into this country. Further, asylum is a discretionary benefit given by the Executive Branch only when legal conditions are met and a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted," Waldman and Stafford said in the joint statement from the departments. "It is lawful and appropriate that this discretionary benefit not be given to those who violate a lawful and tailored presidential proclamation aimed at controlling immigration in the national interest. "
| 
