You guys are talking around the rulng:
“District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (200Cool, is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense WITHIN THE HOME, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. It was also clearly stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that GUNS AND GUN OWNERSHIP WOULD CONTINUE TO BE REGULATED.“
It is clear what it says and means. For now.
For later, a 5-4 decision can go the other way and that right can be reconnected to organized militia, and no gun even in your home. No individual right to have a gun.
| 