« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...

By: micro in BAF | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 09 Mar 18 4:42 PM | 39 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Bash-a-Farter
Msg. 01393 of 06525
(This msg. is a reply to 01389 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

EXACTLY.

ZZ I think that you really simply just are having a hard time understanding what is being said there. And that's okay.

It is also okay to actually have the ruling posted so everyone can read it and understand what it says.

ZIM just did a good job going over it. He is 100 percent correct.

You simply misunderstood what was really said....

Thanks,

micro...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: not being issued a weapon until you pass a class and demonstrate that you're qualified to shoot it...
By: Zimbler0
in BAF
Fri, 09 Mar 18 8:33 AM
Msg. 01389 of 06525

>>>
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (200Cool, is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right
>>>


ZZ,
What you posted - re-quoted here - says that the Supreme Court
has ruled that the 2nd Amendment 'Protects an Individuals
right . . .

Which right ?

>>>
protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes,
>>>

It then goes on to say :

>>>
that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
>>>

To try and put that in English, it says that the DC handgun ban
was a violation and the Supreme Court struck it down.

Why you can not understand this . . . .

Zim.


« BAF Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next