« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Question for you single folks.... 

By: micro in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Thu, 09 Nov 17 10:52 PM | 97 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 38280 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 38275 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

De

cannot speak for anyone but me.

A soldier is not a politician. A Marine follows orders to the letter. I suspect same is supposed to be true for other branches like the Army, but I was not in the army.

My unit was highly mobile and we moved often and covered large areas. We were a fighting unit. We did what we were instructed to do by our superiors.

The question you raise, like " did we stop communism from over running south Vietnam, was it worth it" ? is always a catch 22. For those who think NO, it is a great question.

For those who just wanted to serve their country like every single person in Israel is required to do, keep in mind we don't make the policies. We obey orders and in a hot combat zone you better pay attention and react quickly or you will be twice as likely to wind up in a body bag or maimed for life.

Hindsight is always 20/20 but I was proud to serve my country and would have given my life for it. Still would.

DO I as JOE AMERICAN think we should be the world's policeman? No.

DO I think we should be an isolationist country? No.

Should we get rid of a lot of crybabies and actually do the necessary work to VET people, like the Israelis do getting on an airliner, or allowing them into this country? ABSOLUTELY.

SECURITY comes a price and a cost...

To live in peace when an awful lot of others in the world would prefer to see you dead requires either offensive pro-action or you can simply see the stuff continue to happen here..

It's a shame because once upon a time it was not like this....

I am glad I am at the stage of life I am right now and I fear for my grandkids.

I think your questioning from an economic perspective is in large part non-answerable.

Every bro that is still alive in my unit would go back and do it again if we had to.

I don't think that really answers your question De, but I do not think there really can be a correct answer.

Those who live in peace at the cost of someone else should simply learn to words.

THANK YOU. Because the costs that are required all too often but necessarily result in a lot of funerals, and making of single parent homes, or homes where mom and dad have to grieve...


Just my penny's worth. I am sure Ribit will have his own thoughts as well. I defer to Ribit as he is older to me and so I respect his age and experience.

Good day to you sir!

Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Question for you single folks....
By: Decomposed
in POPE IV
Thu, 09 Nov 17 9:17 PM
Msg. 38275 of 47202

If you'd had $23,000 just burning a hole in your pocket back in 2001, is security what you'd have spent it on? Do you think you've gotten your money's worth?

For those who are married, the same question - except it would be $46,000.

If your answer is no, then why are you supporting these stupid wars? Not only are they harming a lot of people overseas, many of whom are civilians, they're making the U.S. much less popular abroad, increasing our foreign policy costs and costing every one of you a pile of bucks.

You Vietnam vets ought to have fun with this one: Is the War on Terror even winnable? How?
 


August 9, 2017

Study: War on Terror Has Cost $5.6 Trillion, $23k per Taxpayer — More than 3x What Pentagon Claims

Cost of U.S. War on Jihadists: $5.6 Trillion, 7,000 Deaths, 52,500 Injuries

by Edwin Mora
Breitbart.com

The United States is expected to spend nearly $6 trillion through 2018 on government-wide costs related to the wars waged in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria since 2001, reveals a study by Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

According to Brown University’s Cost of War project analysis, authored by Neta Crawford, the total estimated cost of U.S. wars between 2001 and 2018 amounts to about $23,386 per individual American taxpayer, which is more than three times the amount ($7,740) calculated by the Pentagon.

The Pentagon’s study, dubbed the “Estimated Cost to Each Taxpayer for the Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria,” places the total authorized war spending on those conflicts between 2001 and 2018 at $1.5 trillion.

Unlike assessments conducted by the Pentagon and other analysts, Crawford’s estimate takes into account trillions in conflict-linked spending appropriated mainly through the U.S. Departments of Homeland Security, State, Defense, and Veteran Affairs.

On top of direct war spending through the Pentagon, the Brown University study includes $880 billion in new base defense costs linked to combat operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, in addition to nearly $780 billion in Department of Homeland Security costs.

Moreover, the study notes that spending on veterans benefits has increased by nearly $300 billion since 2001 due to those wars.

Nevertheless, the Brown study notes that its “estimate is also conservative,” adding:

Uploaded ImageThis report has not included here state and local government expenses related to medical care of veterans and homeland security. Nor does this report calculate the macro economic costs of war for the US economy. And while this report discusses some of the ways that families bear the burden of caring for seriously veterans [sic], I have not added a value for the costs of their uncompensated care.  [img]http://www.wallstreetbear.com/image/1816_1504366540.jpg" />

The Cost of War project acknowledges that, since the U.S. Congress has yet to pass a budget for 2018, the figures for that period are estimates based on the previous year’s appropriations or the amount that the relevant department has requested.

Overall, Brown University found:

Uploaded ImageAs of late September 2017, the United States wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria and the additional spending on Homeland Security, and the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs since the 9/11 attacks totaled more than $4.3 trillion in current dollars through FY2017. Adding likely costs for FY2018 and estimated future spending on veterans, the costs of war total more than $5.6 trillion.  [img]http://www.wallstreetbear.com/image/1816_1504366540.jpg" />

Besides the trillions of dollars spent on the post-9/11 conflicts, the wars have imposed a profound human cost on Americans: nearly 7,000 U.S. military fatalities and more than 52,500 injuries, according to Breitbart News’s analysis of casualties in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria since 2001.

“Each one of the nearly 7,000 US soldiers killed by wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could be assigned a statistical value of human life — a dollar value to their deaths,” points out Crawford. “The Costs of War Project has not estimated the economic impact on the United States economy — the loss of economic productivity — of the deaths and injuries of US service members due to the wars.”

Crawford reports that the reason she does not break down the cost by individual war zone is that many of the expenditures overlap.

“The long duration of these wars, the fact that they occur simultaneously, involving many of the same personnel and equipment, has meant that their expenses and future costs related to personnel are increasingly difficult to disaggregate,” she notes

In response to the September 11 attacks, the United States launched its “Global War on Terror,” which covered the conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Syria.

It began with the war in Afghanistan in October 2001, then Iraq in 2003, and it ultimately expanded into Syria in 2014.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/11/08/cost-u-s-wars-5-6-trillion-7000-deaths-52500-injuries/


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next