« FAKE NEWS Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Hypocrisy Alert: Today's Trump Bashing Media Thought It Was Awful to Bash Obama in 2009

By: monkeytrots in FAKE NEWS | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 09 Oct 17 11:53 PM | 322 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Fake News Network
Msg. 00501 of 00615
(This msg. is a reply to 00500 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>> Eight years later, does anyone in the liberal media worry that their constant negative coverage might be putting President Trump in danger? ...

Yes, they absolutely DO care. It is there sincere desire that their constant evil invective puts the President, not only in danger, but in mortal danger.

Not my judgement - it is theirs. They have stated that explicitly over and over again, and there is no 'shadow of a doubt' that it is their goal - to incite someone to do in real actions that which they do verbally every single day.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Hypocrisy Alert: Today's Trump Bashing Media Thought It Was Awful to Bash Obama in 2009
By: Beldin
in FAKE NEWS
Mon, 09 Oct 17 11:03 PM
Msg. 00500 of 00615

Yeah, the pathetic double-standards and hypocrisy of the libtards in the FAKE NEWS networks is one of the main reasons why the lamestream media is so roundly reviled and hated in this country. They stupidly blame President Trump, but they are the ones who have denigrated and debauched themselves. 

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2017/10/09/hypocrisy-alert-todays-trump-bashing-media-thought-it-was-awful-bash

Over the past several months, journalists have had no qualms about attacking President Trump on a deeply personal level, calling him an "embarrassing" "unhinged" "liar," a "sociopath" and a "madman" presiding over a "malignant presidency."

But eight years ago, many of these same reporters were offended at criticism of Barack Obama and his policies, scorning the "mean," "ugly," "offensive" "vitriol" and "idiot talk" hurled at the last President during the same months of his term.

While the media have given plenty of oxygen to anti-Trump protests since his first day in office, the Tea Party protests against Obama in 2009 were disparaged as "orchestrated," "AstroTurf," and criticism of ObamaCare was portrayed as a consequence of racist unwillingness to accept a black President.

Today's journalists see it as a badge of professionalism to harass Trump and his spokesmen, but eight years ago some reporters derided talk radio, Fox News and others in the media who failed to get on board the Obama train as peddling "hateful crap" that "borders on sedition."

Some in the media even suggested that criticism of Obama was threatening "the President's personal safety," with New York Times columnist Tom Friedman raising the 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by an extremist: "The parallels to Israel then and America today turn my stomach."

Eight years later, does anyone in the liberal media worry that their constant negative coverage might be putting President Trump in danger? ...


« FAKE NEWS Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next