« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech - Again 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (8)
Tue, 20 Jun 17 10:50 PM | 266 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 21618 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 21617 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

>> targeting a minority in the United States.

Wow- Racist/bigotted resolution to boot.

How about 'targeting any PERSON in the United States.

We know why. Logic and true equality under the law are now meaningless, and everything must appeal emotionally and to the politically correct.

So falleth the Fourteenth Ammendment.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech - Again
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Tue, 20 Jun 17 10:18 PM
Msg. 21617 of 21975

U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech - Again

- The law already prohibits violence and threats of violence, and law enforcement authorities are supposed to prosecute those -- intimidation, destruction, damage, vandalism, simple and aggravated assault. What "hate crimes" are not already covered by the law?

- Why would the House of Representatives find it necessary to make such redundant statements, if not in order to redefine the concept of a hate crime? Perhaps by including "hate speech"? The current resolution includes most of the major ethnic and religious minorities in the United States, so it will have a far better chance of passing, as it will more easily fool Representatives into thinking that the contents of the resolution are harmless.

- Would it not be appropriate for the politicians sponsoring and voting for these resolutions first of all to find out what drives the organizations responsible for drafting them? The Investigative Project on Terrorism has authored a damning 88-page report about the Muslim Public Affairs Council. American politicians do not seem to have taken much interest in it.

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, "Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States". The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). On April 6, 2017, EmgageUSA wrote the following on their Facebook page:

"Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country's founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream".

More: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10544/criminalize-free-speech


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next