« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Score ANOTHER VICTORY for Judicial Watch: Federal Court Demands Release Of Hillary's State Dept Emails On Benghazi Attack 

By: ribit in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 08 May 17 6:22 PM | 79 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 25120 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 25107 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

...can you say "redacted"?

Uploaded Image




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Score ANOTHER VICTORY for Judicial Watch: Federal Court Demands Release Of Hillary's State Dept Emails On Benghazi Attack
By: monkeytrots
in POPE IV
Mon, 08 May 17 2:07 PM
Msg. 25107 of 47202


by Tyler Durden
May 6, 2017 2:45 PM

A Washington DC federal court judge has ordered the State Department to turn over Hillary Clinton’s emails that immediately followed the terrorist attack in Benghazi to the conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch.

As RT reports, US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson reviewed the documents and rejected the government’s contention that the records had been properly withheld under FOIA exemption.

The “Defendant contends that it properly withheld eight identical paragraphs in two different emails, which were summaries of calls between the President of the United States and the Presidents of Libya and Egypt in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack,” wrote Judge Jackson in her memorandum opinion on March 20.

The State Department argued the summaries were meant to provide information to senior officials to be used in their decision making on how to respond to a national security crisis.

Plaintiffs argued the subject line of the email “Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt," and the FYSA annotation, a common acronym for 'For Your Situational Awareness' “refute any suggestion of careful analysis, deliberation or judgment.

“The Court finds that the two records, even if just barely pre-decisional, are not deliberative,” and “the Court finds that the misconduct exception cannot be evoked in this FOIA action…and defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part… Defendant is instructed to produce documents C05739592 and CO5739595 to plaintiff,” wrote Judge Jackson.

(article continues)

... Welllllllll .... a partial victory anyhoooz.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-06/dc-court-demands-state-department-release-clinton-emails-benghazi-attack


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next