« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Summary of the evidence so far on the alleged Russian hack of the US election 

By: capt_nemo in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 17 Dec 16 6:50 AM | 43 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 16497 of 47202
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Uploaded Image

A summary of the evidence so far:-

The accusation that Russia is behind the leak of Podesta and DNC emails/data stems from “unnamed intelligence sources” relayed “by unnamed government officials”. No hard evidence has been presented to back up the claim. Nobody wants to put their name to the claim. The claim seems to be being pushed by the CIA, with James Clapper (DNI) and the FBI seeming to distance themselves from the claims of John Brennan (CIA Director).

All the multitude of media reports repeating this claim, based on zero reported evidence are meaningless. The entire media en-masse also repeated the obvious Bush/Cheney lies on Saddam’s non existent WMD’s in 2002.

On the converse, that it was NOT a Russian hack:-

These are the best articles I have seen that it was NOT a Russian hack, but that they were leaks from a disgruntled DNC insider who was unhappy about the DNC rigging the primaries against Sanders and that the Podesta leak was sourced from data captured by the NSA and given to Craig Murray in Washington DC by a disgruntled US intelligence agent.

Revealed: Who Gave Democratic Emails to Wikileaks
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/12/source-providing-democratic-emails-wikileaks-revealed.html

High-Level American Intelligence Officials: “Allegations of Hacking Election Are Baseless”
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/

Full Assange radio interview with Sean Hannity on 15th December. Assange categorically states the Russians had nothing to do with DNC or Podesta leaks
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/809533335487868928

Former UK Ambassador Says Source Of Clinton Emails Was “Disgusted” Democratic Whistleblower
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-14/former-uk-ambassador-says-source-clinton-emails-was-disgusted-democratic-whistleblow

Keystone Cops portrayal of Russia’s highly efficient intelligence services is Democratic Party anti-Russian racism
https://twitter.com/CraigMurrayOrg/status/809143620464996352

Craig Murray: The CIA’s absence of conviction – the leaks didn’t come from the Russians
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/

Russia hacking allegations in interests of ‘military intelligence’ – NSA whistleblower Bill Binney
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/370465-russia-hacking-claims-nsa-binney/

In the above article, William Binney 36 year senior NSA vet, points out that no evidence has been presented of any data from the DNC or Podesta being electronically removed from the United States via a hack. The NSA would have evidence of such a hack if it had occurred. The trace of a previous incident was traced back to a building in China, but no evidence of this latest alleged hack has been provided.

The Russians have asked the US to present any evidence they have on the alleged hack, or to stop making baseless accusations.

Given the above evidence Obama’s threat of “retaliation” against Russia, which is a nuclear power, on the basis of what seems to be baseless evidence free lies, is indeed RECKLESS.

Obama should put up or shut up and if he can’t “put up” he should stop increasing international tensions in order to play domestic politics for the benefit of the Neocons, to a gullible American public.

The whole “blaming Russian” thing as the source of the leaks has been an attempt, from July, at deflecting attention from the CONTENTS of the leaks.
The leaks revealed the conspiracy to rig the primaries against Sanders by the DNC (which led to 4+ senior resignations/firings).
They confirmed the Clinton Foundation corruption, via Teneo and Doug Band, and pay to play / pay for access with foreign donors.
And they confirmed the conspiracy to hack the election between the “liberal” media, John Podesta and Hillary Clinton cronies by planting multiple stories in the mass media by tame so called “journalists”, feeding debate questions to Hillary beforehand etc.

more,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, http://investmentwatchblog.com/summary-of-the-evidence-so-far-on-the-alleged-russian-hack-of-the-us-election/




Avatar

Realist - Everybody in America is soft, and hates conflict. The cure for this, both in politics and social life, is the same -- hardihood. Give them raw truth.




» You can also:
« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next