Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What can you say when they refuse to see the TRUTH.... 

By: Beldin in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Fri, 09 Dec 16 11:47 PM | 58 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board 		Msg. 16035 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 16027 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

All you have to do is take one look at the new picture that clo put up at the Further Freedom From Thought board. BWHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

To Bat-Guano-Crazy clo, Hitlery lost the election because:

1. The Democrats were hacked by the Russians.

{Forget the fact that they stupidly left themselves wide open to hacking by WikiLeaks, the Russians, the Chinese, the Cubans, the North Koreans, the Iranians, ISIS, and Pee Wee Herman ... the content of the Clintonista e-mails clearly proved that Hillary Clinton and her cohorts were and are self-serving, hateful, greedy, despicable, anti-American criminals. It doesn't matter who peeked into Clintonista communications ... the real problem for clo is that it revealed the true, vile nature of her Clintonista heroes. The issue for her is not that they are vile, despicable criminals - it's that they got caught! Laughing }

2. Hillary was "kneecapped by the FBI."

{The Attorney General unethically and immorally conspired with Billy Jeff Clinton to sweep Hillary Clinton's treasonous behavior under the rug. FBI Director Comey complied with this conspiracy by inventing nonexistent law out of whole cloth to excuse why Hillary would not be properly prosecuted (like anyone else in the same position would be!) for her obvious crimes. And, that would have been that if Hillary's muzzie love interest wasn't married to the typical Democrat pajama boy (i.e., sick pervert) who revealed his computer had a bunch of e-mails that Hillary said did not exist. But no problem, the corrupted James Comey whitewashed this away, too. So, in truth, the FBI director didn't kneecap Hillary ... far from it ... he did his best to shield her. But, it was to no avail because Hillary's criminal stench was just too strong to overcome.}

3. Hillary's voting base was suppressed by every red state in America.

{This is total looney tunes stuff here! Laughing If Jill Stein's money-grabbing scheme ... uh ... I mean ... "vote recount effort" ... proved anything at all, it showed that Democrat voter fraud occurred and Trump still won.}

Take out the Democrat voter fraud and the absentee ballots that never got counted (because they would not have changed the results in any of the states) and Hillary's supposed "win" in the popular vote becomes very marginal, at best, or even flips over to a Trump victory.

clo lives in La La Land ...

Uploaded Image




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
What can you say when they refuse to see the TRUTH....
By: Decomposed in POPE IV
Fri, 09 Dec 16 10:24 PM 		Msg. 16027 of 47202

clo, 

re: "67% of Trump voters believe unemployment rose under Obama.
What can you say when they refuse to see the TRUTH...."

I think you do not understand that most Republicans have a different definition of "unemployment" than you do. Republicans believe in "underemployment," for instance. That's the idea that there's been a net LOSS of employment if a full-time employee becomes a part-time employee. And, under Former-President Obama, there was a huge increase in PART-TIME employees. You liberals don't recognize or question that.

Republicans are also aware of "discouraged workers" - that is, people SUCH AS YOURSELF who have left the workforce because they cannot find work. Admittedly, you never really had a job and therefore didn't truly leave the workforce, but I think you still fall into this category. Remember how, before the Obama administration, you used to tell us about the occasional caretaking stints you were getting? Now you don't get them anymore. Granted, it might have something to do with the time that you forgot to feed the baby that was in your care, but it also might have to do with Obama and policies that made it just a little bit harder for working parents to go out on the town and hire a babysitter.

"Discouraged workers" are not treated as "unemployed" by the federal government. Government only counts people who are actively receiving unemployment benefits. Once those benefits end, the people are no longer considered "unemployed." Does THAT seem right to you? It sure doesn't to Republicans.

Speaking for myself, I wouldn't consider it to be a wash when an American is replaced by an Illegal, either. But our government does - when it reports unemployment as a percent and not as an actual number. See, the unemployment rate can fall even as the number who are unemployed grow. That's how math works. You know - the math you never took because of your little 10th grade "incident."

Just thought I'd help. Let us know if you have any questions. This IS an open board, you know. Feel free to pipe up. Unlike our opinions on your board, reasoned dissent does not frighten this board's regulars. 

« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next