« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Why does OCU... 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Thu, 03 Nov 16 5:04 AM | 78 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 13177 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 13129 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Micro> You mean to say that the residual remaining chemical still left in a WARhead is still toxic and lethal?


My Dear Micro,
It isn't the 'residual' chemicals that might or might
not be in the warhead . . . it is what the thing was
designed for.

Empty chemical warheads are the best kind - - because one can fill them with the most appropriate chemical.

Think about it.
If'n I was saddam Hussein . . . and I had some rioting
Sunni who's attitudes I wanted to correct, I'd fill them
with tear gas - don't want to hurt my supporters too badly.

For uppity Shiites, a blister agent like mustard gas would
be most appropriate.

And, for those uppity Kurds or stinking iranians,
Nerve gas. Kill'm all and let Allah sort'em out.

Get it?
Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Why does OCU...
By: micro
in POPE IV
Wed, 02 Nov 16 3:40 PM
Msg. 13129 of 47202

ZIm, Zimmy my man,

You mean to say that the residual remaining chemical still left in a WARhead is still toxic and lethal?

AND, worse yet, in a WARhead? ISn;t the word WARhead used to describe an inanimate object designed to deliver lethal and deadly materials in a warlike ACT upon human beings???

OMG. Seems as if the moron with three letters is every bit as DUMB, and in as much denial of the obvious as the other folks he chooses to hang around with.....


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next