« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Employing a little logic with regard to yesterday's extraordinary announcement... 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE IV | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 29 Oct 16 11:34 PM | 94 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 12833 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 12828 by Decomposed)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I hope it was the first thing - that SOME within the
FBI still have a moral compass that works.

Regardless, if hillary clinton gets into the White
House I am going to consider her Presidency illegitimate. And, I am still interested in things I might
be able to do to spite her without being killed or jailed . . .

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Employing a little logic with regard to yesterday's extraordinary announcement...
By: Decomposed
in POPE IV
Sat, 29 Oct 16 10:32 PM
Msg. 12828 of 47202

Yesterday's announcement was truly extraordinary. Historically significant. Here's my analysis:

First, Comey *is* corrupt. He's owned by the Progressives. There's no denying it given the blind eye he turned to the charges against Hillary Clinton when he declared them baseless. They were NOT baseless. They were open and shut. She failed to protect highly sensitive material. A trial was warranted.

That begs the question, WHY would he have made yesterday's decision to re-open the investigation? There are only two possibilities.

1) He had no choice. That means, he was threatened. Given that powerful outside parties are all on Hillary's side, it had to have been powerful INSIDE parties. The FBI itself. I've already read interviews with unidentified investigators who stated that NONE Of the investigators agreed with Comey's earlier decision. They all agreed that action was warranted. Most felt that charges should be filed, but a few disagreed but felt that Hillary Clinton's security clearance should be stripped. They UNANIMOUSLY agreed on that.

So, they may have approached James Comey and told him that he either re-opens the investigation immediately, to give the public a fair basis for deciding whether they want to elect a candidate who may be an unindicted criminal, OR they would go public with corruption allegations against the director.

The second possibility is more complex. It is that Comey was asked by outside parties to re-open the investigation. Why? How about because the FBI's credibility needs to be reestablished in the public's mind prior to Hillary stealing the election.

In other words, if it is considered plausible right now that Donald Trump will win the election, Hillary Clinton will enact her plan to STEAL it. There would then be an investigation... by the FBI... and it would legitimize Hillary's win. But it could only do that if the public has some trust that the FBI itself is not compromised.

Comey re-opens the investigation, and Hillary throws Huma Abedin under the bus. Huma is indicted. The public is relieved to learn that the FBI *is* the non-partisan investigatory body it is supposed to be. Hillary is elected. People point out that the election was stolen. The FBI investigates and announces that the allegations are false. Hillary takes office and, once firmly seated, she pardons Huma of all charges.

That's how I see it. Two possibilities. Only two possibilities. 


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next