« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Computer Memory usage?

By: micro in POPE IV | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 09 Oct 16 7:39 PM | 53 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 11907 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 11904 by Zimbler0)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Zim

The computer in question, assuming it is the same one, has a grand total of 512 MB

That was running XP and it is slower than dirt because if one puts any amount of info or tries to multi task with that, you will experience delays and slowness.

For decent performance I always recommend 2 GB minimum for XP, 4 GB if you want it really work easily.

Remember that RAM also stores your software you are using and it must flow through the memory to the processor uninhibited. It is a highway if you will. The more lanes you have, the better the traffic (info, data) flows.

USUALLY older machines that migrated UP to XP did not have but single core processors and even the dual cored ones were pretty slow, especially due to the L2 cache.

On windows 7, which is at least FOUR TIMES LARGER than windows XP , requires even more RAM to keep things flowing freely..

This is why MOST machines sold with windows 7 have at least 4 GB of RAM, and many have 8 GB.

IN order to do so, they MUST BE 64 bit operating systems. 32 bit systems do not recognize or use anything over 3.5 GB of RAM.

At todays memory prices Zim, you really should upgrade the memory if your motherboard will take more. You are bare bones on memory my man.

When I click SOMETHING, I want that something to appear right now, in an instant, and be able to have five or six other windows open at same time with no performance issues.

You should have a minimum of four GB of newer memory to have really decent performance.


Hope this helps!!

my best,

micro....


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Computer Memory usage?
By: Zimbler0
in POPE IV
Sun, 09 Oct 16 7:27 PM
Msg. 11904 of 47202

Micro> If so, you do not have enough memory to run windows 7 on it and you really did not have enough to run xp either, as


Out of curiosity . . .
How much memory does the machine in question have?

One site tells me that XP needs a minimum of 128 Megs
of RAM. I'm thinking where I work we often had machines running XP with 500 Megs . . and (when I could)
I'd upgrade them to 1 Gig and it'd be sweet.

Today most of our machines are running Windows 7. And
I know I have it running on some 1 Gig RAM machines.
(But I really prefer to have 2 Gigs or more . . .)

Zim.


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next