The FIRST thing you want to do when vetting a political candidate for authenticity is find out about their source of political funds. IF GOLDMAN SACHS IS ON THE RADAR THEY ARE PURCHASED. PERIOD. To assume anything else is wishful and naive thinking. Goldman doesn't do charity -- they BUY people and favors; they bought Cruz long ago and everything coming out of his mouth was drivel for those who look at words and not at actions & funding.
Anyway, Heidi dropped out of GS in order for her ownership to not be a political issue; Now Cruz is gone from contention it is okay for the Cruz's to go back to the GS dole. It's shocking how many candidates from both parties can be indisputably tied to GS ownership.
In the 2008 election, GS owned McCain; Obama AND (of course) Hillary... with their biggest bet on Obama. And their bets paid off probably 1000 to 1 as they were permitted to become labeled a bank so they could get Paulson appointed to the Bush cabinet; TARP benefits; escape all criminal liability; and fill up the West Wing of the White House from day one with Obama.
Follow the money. BELIEVE what the money flow tells you as far as corruption is concerned. Trump increasingly looks beholden to others as well -- although there was probably no way to the White House without at least some of that.
Anyway, I wanted to share this with those who thought Ted Cruz might have been good. Nope. That was just another Rope a Dope attempt, with John Q Public on the rope.
| 
