Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: There is a PAC ribit and DGP I do not understand 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 24 May 16 5:30 AM | 56 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board 		Msg. 06949 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 06913 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Decomposed> things that don't actually threaten us - such as Libya, Syria and formerly Iraq


De,
Saddam Hussein was a proud sponsor of Islamic terrorists.
9-11 proved just how big a threat to these United States
they could be.

Libya and Syria . . . we could have handled the bulk
of the work from 30,000 feet.

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: There is a PAC ribit and DGP I do not understand
By: Decomposed in POPE IV
Mon, 23 May 16 7:27 PM 		Msg. 06913 of 47202

micro: 

re: "We go because we have a sense of duty."

Do you disagree with my assertion that most would prefer a President who takes their lives seriously?

Or with my assertion that Sanders is the candidate who is most likely to do so?

As I said, if staying out of unnecessary conflicts was my main concern, I'd be voting for Sanders. If I was in the military, this very well could be my main concern. It's one thing to want to do your duty for your country. It's very much of another to want your country to put you in danger over things that don't actually threaten us - such as Libya, Syria and formerly Iraq.

Military force should be a last resort, not a first one.
 

« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next