and here are two paragraphs which clearly demonstrate where this smear dog comes from:
"The fact is this apocalyptic diagnosis is ridiculous. The Obama administration has done things people like me strongly disagree with. But America is in better economic shape than any other major nation on earth. Crime is down. Abortion rates are down. Fourteen million new jobs have been created in five years.
Obama has championed a liberal agenda, but he hasn’t made the country unrecognizable. In 2008, federal spending accounted for about 20.3 percent of gross domestic product. In 2015, it accounted for about 20.9 percent."
He is an OBAMA apologist.....
So, go after Cruz. As solicitor General of Texas, why didn't the article talk about the overwhelming number of cases he argued in front of the Supreme Court and won???
Some of those cases were for reversals of LIBERAL BS that would have affected many people in not only Texas, but nationwide?
Or do we merely want to take one simple case and try to use that as a smear tactic against somebody's "character"????
Let's not forget the guy that was arrested was a thief and likely was not the first thing he ever stole and the only thing he is sorry about is that he got CAUGHT THIS TIME......
Just another example of the New York Times trying to smear the most Constitutional candidate there is bar none.
Then again, what would you expect from the LIBERAL RAG of a paper. bleeding profusely from loss of readership, other than to attack and smear a conservative. This week it's Cruz. Next week it will be Trump and the week after it will be Rubio.
| 
