From the same place ZIM:
>>>
Over the next two decades, monetarism seemed to work really well. The 1990s in particular were a decade of peace and prosperity for the West.
Sure, there were two big market crashes in 2000 and 2007, when the dot-com and property bubbles collapsed. But the monetarists said those could have been avoided if central banks had been more sophisticated, and quicker to increase rates in order to snuff out those bubbles. Economics was reduced to an argument over monetarist timing and technique, rather than the larger principle of who exactly should be in control of capitalism — a bank or a government.
>>>
Zim : "In control of capitalism" . . . .
Clearly the author of this article is a severe moron.
I think he does have one thing right, though.
Negative interest rates are NOT working, and they will never work.
(Unless one's goal is to make it more feasible for
governments and bankers to steal more and more of our
money - or the efforts of 'We The Peoples' labors.)
Zim.

Mad Poet Strikes Again.