« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: WTF is with all the solar haters???? I think its the best new source of energy there is...I 'm confused LOL 

By: DGpeddler in POPE IV | Recommend this post (1)
Mon, 18 Jan 16 3:23 AM | 108 view(s)
Boardmark this board | POPES NEW and Improved Real Board
Msg. 02636 of 47202
(This msg. is a reply to 02632 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #


micro, I totally agree with you.
I would be more likely to try it
if I could break even after two
or three years. The far outside
number I would consider is ten
years. But at my age I personally
would not try it for ten years
because I would probably be dead
in less than ten years. The ten
years would be for someone in
their twenties. I would suspect
that in the next ten years here,
I would have a bad hail storm
that would break many of them.
I suspect a windmill would be
more likely to survive the
weather for ten years in West Texas.
But then, what do I know.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: WTF is with all the solar haters???? I think its the best new source of energy there is...I 'm confused LOL
By: micro
in POPE IV
Mon, 18 Jan 16 2:14 AM
Msg. 02632 of 47202

I disagree with that but its okay for diversity of what constitutes a good rate of return on investment.

Five years would be better by a long shot and that is the longest I would ever even consider a long shot as an equipment investment over the years.
Normal is TWO years for MOST top tier manufacturing companies.

I am a little less stringent and looked for three to four but depending upon cost and longevity I would on a far outside whim consider a five year return.

Ten??? Totally out of the realm of consideration FOR ME. Maybe not for you. And that does not make YOU wrong. Just the difference between two people...


« POPE IV Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next