Captain,
I read the article entirely.
Not one time does it say how much the second loan was for, although it spent plenty of words describing why a loan of that nature was such a POTENTIALLY HORRIBLE THING that could lead to influence and corruption or control of a senator or maybe even a POTUS ike Clinton or Obama?
The second loan they claim to have found is no different than the loan he took out the first time. HIS wife is an employee of Goldman. She has been so if you need a loan, where are you going to go, a totally strange bank that knows nothing about you or your ability to repay it?
The loans were totally disclosed in the sec filings.
The only technicality here is that someone on his team failed to note the loans, already on file with the sec, to the FEC on a separate form.
I don;t think its a big deal unless someone is anti-Cruz and just looking to find something to ruin his chances of running for office....
You think Cruz is in the back pocket of Banksters?
HOW did this article come to the matter of fact finding that the Cruz campaign INTENTIONALLY left out filing the loans with the fec? The first one was already admitted to and out in the open as a simple oversight, and if they did not realize they had to disclose to the federal elections commission with one, because they thought surely the SEC filing would be on record for all the world to see, why would they realize that same thing with the other loan??
I think this a huge over reach of conclusion by someone looking to declare Cruz some kind of Bankster type mafia guy.
Ask yourself this: WHY is Ted Cruz the most despised Senator in the Senate by his fellow Republican Senators?
Is it because he is an establishment candidate in their back pocket? Or is it because he has spent his first term being anti-establishment and sticking up for the Constitution?
Long before this election he was defending the Constitution and sticking it to the establishment republicans, who are ALL in the back pocket of progressivism.
Cruz is his own man and not one of them, which is why NOBODY in his own part except for a few like Rand Paul, like him.
This article is a HACK piece with no factual basis for their assumptions and they would have every gullible reader on a witch hunt to derail Cruz believe it as some kind of fact that HE somehow is in the BANKSTERS BACK POCKET.
I see no evidence of that but I do note that the authors have given Rubio and Trump and Jeb a big pass.
Kind of telling.....
JMO
micro...
| 
