Interesting facts.
So much for the 'super-PAC' money ? Hmmmm .... the point is to displace conservatives, the only ones that go for limited government, from the election cycle. With Romney, they were extremely successful. With the 8 other candidates (or was Romney one of those) ... were they or were they not successful in their real goal ?
VOTER ID - Absolutely on the fraud. I believe it was on a mind boggling scale this cycle - Philadelphia was obvious fraud - which cost Pennsylvania. So easy to reprogram a machine with damn near undetectable 'tilting' - especially when the code can be self-wiping for any forensics. Electronic ballots should absolutely be outlawed. Paper was easily corruptable, also - but there WAS a paper trail that could be followed. Like the term Musurper. Other evidence - following the first debate - their was a very sudden change in 'confidence' for the dems. Not only was Benghazi being successfully covered up - but I believe they knew at that time that their fraud was going to 'pass muster' - because early voting had started, and nobody was glomming onto what was going on - other than a few 'spurious machines' that astute voters caught cheating.
Side bet: You're on. He may be brazen enough to try that himself, but he won't be allowed to do so - too obvious. However, there WILL be some other 'less obvious' obeisance to his moon mothers - such as facing towards mecca.
Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...
| 
