« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Bill Quick simplifies... 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Fri, 14 Sep 12 10:15 AM | 86 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 19593 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 19592 by DueDillinger)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Due, It is obviously all a conspiracy of Mitt to make dadburn sure that I get out and vote those occupying pieces of shit out of office.

Deal is sealed.

You were right - it can NOT get any worse than Obama.

As in germany in the early 20th century.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Bill Quick simplifies...
By: DueDillinger
in CONSTITUTION
Fri, 14 Sep 12 9:02 AM
Msg. 19592 of 21975

[From] Shall Not Be Questioned ( http://www.pagunblog.com/2012/09/12/on-the-late-conflagration-in-north-africa/ ):

On the Late Conflagration in North Africa

I don’t think anyone’s religion should be above criticism, but there’s criticism, and there’s throwing a match on a gasoline soaked keg of powder, by doing it in a way that is bound to be deeply offensive. Eugene Volokh has a link to the poorly acted, low-budget film that lit the fuse ( http://xrl.us/bnppp8 ). It is critical, but in a deliberately provocative way. Imagine how strong Christians would react to a depiction of Jesus going down on Mary Magdalene? You can bet the reaction would be non-violent, but I wouldn’t blame them for being just as deeply offended as many Muslims will no doubt be upon seeing this video.

I just don’t get this attitude. [Neither do I --∆∆]

The attempt to be “reasonable.” The notion that Muslims have a point in waging war on us (yes, invading our embassies and murdering our ambassadors are acts of war, a point almost entirely unmentioned in the reporting on these incidents so far), over their being offended by a movie they don’t like.

Turn it around. I’m offended by these acts of war, and the tens of thousands of other acts of war, terrorism, and slaughter committed by Muslim jihadis against us and our allies over the years. So I would expect the moderates to be quite understanding at my approach of nuking the 100 largest Muslim cities, along with Mecca and Medina, because I have been offended.

After all, the fact that I’ve been offended explains and excuses all, right?

If not, then why the hell do you people keep bringing it up as if it does?

From where I sit, those morons who would self-censor First Amendment guaranteed liberties in order to avoid offending others are enemies of liberty itself. The most “offensive” examples of the exercise of these liberties are the canaries in the coal mine, and attempting to abridge them is the first step of a short and steep slide down to tyranny. 

http://www.dailypundit.com/2012/09/13/im-offended-too/

Uploaded Image

∆∆


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next