« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ol' Remus on battlefields...

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 10 Aug 12 5:44 AM | 86 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 19220 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 19219 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Micro - I think that going Jeffersonian would be accurate ....

When Due's post said 'low risk' - it meant low risk relative to futile rank confrontation. Compared to everyday normal life, even sabotage is EXTREME HIGH RISK.

When it comes to 'spilling blood' - no problem there - Just not going to waste even one drop of that precious liquid of mine - Going to make them pay dearly for every single drop.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Ol' Remus on battlefields...
By: micro
in CONSTITUTION
Fri, 10 Aug 12 4:09 AM
Msg. 19219 of 21975

Ahhhh my dear professor.

I think that going Jeffersonian would be accurate as well with the tree of liberty needing to be refreshed from time to time.....

But if one needs to actually ever rise up to defend one's self and nation from tyrannical powers, then they would be better prepared to do so, in the small arms segment, with at least close to equal weaponry, which in my view is what the 2nd amendment is about.

Thank God that our men under Washington had muskets for rifles just as the Brits did.

May God have mercy on us that these things need not be necessary....

the best,


micro.....


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next