« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ol' Remus on battlefields...

By: micro in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 10 Aug 12 4:09 AM | 68 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 19219 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 19217 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Ahhhh my dear professor.

I think that going Jeffersonian would be accurate as well with the tree of liberty needing to be refreshed from time to time.....

But if one needs to actually ever rise up to defend one's self and nation from tyrannical powers, then they would be better prepared to do so, in the small arms segment, with at least close to equal weaponry, which in my view is what the 2nd amendment is about.

Thank God that our men under Washington had muskets for rifles just as the Brits did.

May God have mercy on us that these things need not be necessary....

the best,


micro.....


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Ol' Remus on battlefields...
By: monkeytrots
in CONSTITUTION
Fri, 10 Aug 12 2:38 AM
Msg. 19217 of 21975

Good post - decent analysis and overview.

Competent sabotage is low risk, low cost, high return. ...

... and, most importantly, Competent sabotage is HIGH SURVIVAL rates of the saboteur (that's what 'low risk' means).

SURVIVAL IS KEY - dead saboteurs can't sabot-age.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next