« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Gun Lovers: New York's Nanny Bloomberg Won't Protect You  

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 02 Aug 12 6:38 AM | 63 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 19107 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 19105 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

8 deaths in no-guns -allowed Chicago yesterday. I think snorf posted that Chicago's the most dangerous city in the world or something like that.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Gun Lovers: New York's Nanny Bloomberg Won't Protect You
By: Beldin
in CONSTITUTION
Wed, 01 Aug 12 9:54 PM
Msg. 19105 of 21975

Yeah, Kathy ... you are absolutely 110% correct. I don't need to highlight all of the recent instances of personal instability and stupidity exhibited by Michael Bloomberg ... you and the Professor have already done a good job of that ... but, I did find the illogic of Bloomberg on this issue to be quite laughable. Bloomberg proposes that all police forces go on strike until the American populace disarms. So, exactly when would the citizenry most be in immediate need of their personally owned firearms, eh? Doh! ... that would be when they are the only line of defense against criminals, which practically speaking, is already the case even when police forces are not on strike. Therefore, Bloomberg's idiotic suggestion of a police strike would be an even stronger argument for American citizens to load up on more firearms and ammunition. Clearly, Michael Bloomberg does not personally possess the intellectual firepower to extricate himself from a wet paper bag. Rolling Eyes


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next