« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: What the hell were we thinking?

By: DueDillinger in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 12 Jul 12 7:50 AM | 48 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 18933 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 18930 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I think volcanic events put more dust in the atmosphere, but that's not an opinion based on any data. That there was significant contamination from the testing in indisputable. This article begins to quantify the problem:

State seeks compensation for Nevada Test Site contamination

The Nevada Legislature wants the U.S. government to contain and mitigate about 300 million curies of radioactive contamination left in the soil and water of the former nuclear weapons testing site.

June 09, 2011 By Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times

The Nevada Legislature has taken the first step in demanding that the federal government make amends for massive radioactive contamination left by decades of nuclear weapons testing on a swath of desert the size of Rhode Island.

In a joint resolution, the state's Senate and House are asking the federal government to contain and mitigate about 300 million curies of contamination left in the soil and water of the former Nevada Test Site, about 75 miles northwest of Las Vegas.


The Energy Department detonated 921 nuclear warheads underground before testing ended in 1992. An estimated 1.6 trillion gallons of water in aquifers under the site are radioactively contaminated with the byproducts of the bomb tests.

The resolution will open the way for Nevada to demand compensation for the loss of its water resources, said Assemblyman Ed Goedhart, the resolution's lead sponsor. He said the resolution stemmed from a detailed examination of the radioactive legacy of testing that was published by The Times in November 2009.

"It is one of the largest contamination zones in the U.S., if not the world," Goedhart said. "If we are prevented from using our water resources, it is a taking and we should be compensated."

The Energy Department has said the contaminated water is moving very slowly downhill toward Death Valley National Park, but it could take thousands of years to reach any affected community.

Until then, it would be technically and economically impossible to purify the water, some of which is 5,000 feet below the land surface, Energy Department scientists have asserted.

"The test site has been declared a sacrifice zone," said , Joseph Strolin, acting director of Nevada's Agency for Nuclear Projects. "The federal officials are basically taking the approach that this can never be cleaned up and will be monitored in perpetuity."

Darwin Morgan, spokesman for the federal facility, now known as the Nevada National Security Site, said the federal government had broadly involved state and local officials in its efforts under a consent order to monitor the contaminated water.

"We have a process where we work very closely with the state," Morgan said. "We are monitoring where that water is going, which includes involvement by the state of Nevada."

Morgan added that the state engineer of Nevada, not the Energy Department, had rejected applications to pump water from the site.

There is little dispute that the water held under the test site could be valuable in parched southern Nevada. A local hydrologist estimated in 2009 that the 1.6 trillion gallons of water would be worth $48 billion, based on water rights sales in Nye County, where the test site is located.

The resolution will do little more than ask the federal government to discuss the matter with state officials, Strolin said. Nevada has looked at filing a formal legal demand for compensation over the last year, but such legal action would be difficult to press, he added.

The resolution was passed unanimously late last week and sent to the secretary of state for enrollment, which is pending, Goedhart said.

Much if not most of the testing was underground.

Uploaded Image

∆∆




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: What the hell were we thinking?
By: monkeytrots
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 12 Jul 12 7:35 AM
Msg. 18930 of 21975

That is an incredible work of presenting the information in a very understandable and 'hit ya in the gut' style.

Dave's wandering brain, of course, went astray from the conventional take on the purpose of the video .... and it occurs to him this thought:

"Hmmm .... How much of the so-called global warming in 1998 and a couple of years later (it has cooled since then) was due to the end of a mini-"nuclear winter" caused by so many nuclear explosions in such a short period of time ?

Inquiring minds ask questions like this.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next