« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: ed1: Re: Really, Linda ? 

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 06 Jun 12 8:29 AM | 45 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 18476 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 18472 by monkeytrots)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Just did a search, came up with zilch. And my saved web sites on TMI are MIA. So, I'm bowing out. Everything I'm seeing now says no problemo.




Avatar




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
ed1: Re: Really, Linda ?
By: monkeytrots
in CONSTITUTION
Wed, 06 Jun 12 7:15 AM
Msg. 18472 of 21975

Maniati and I had many heated debates. I do not recall if TMI was one of them.

The photos - whether fake or not - ARE NOT DOCUMENTED.

The NRC investigated - they found .... NOTHING of the sort. So, yeah, I would say the photos are pure bullshit, Linda.

Freaks of nature happen ... ALL THE TIME. If you want to see REAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE, properly documented, take a look at all the scientific research that has been published, well documented, peer reviewed, and published BY RESPECTABLE SOURCES (edit) ABOUT CHERNOBYL. (sorry I left that part off).


Show me the same for TMI, Linda - not these 'millions of nut job sources' that google comes up with so easily on TMI - and then we can discuss the possibility that the NRC was TOTALLY CORRUPT in their findings.

Nope - don't buy it, not at all, Linda.

The radiation releases were MINI-SCULE at the time - and NOBODY has EVER proven any differently. A lot of claims and bullshit 'non-documentation' out there - but nothing even in the same ballpark as the quality of info available for Chernobyl.


Don't give a damn about 'millions of hits' - those are easy to get for almost anything - especially something as hyped as TMI has been.

GIVE ME QUALITY - that's what I gave you, Linda.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next