« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

ed1: Re: Really, Linda ?

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 06 Jun 12 7:15 AM | 43 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 18472 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 18471 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Maniati and I had many heated debates. I do not recall if TMI was one of them.

The photos - whether fake or not - ARE NOT DOCUMENTED.

The NRC investigated - they found .... NOTHING of the sort. So, yeah, I would say the photos are pure bullshit, Linda.

Freaks of nature happen ... ALL THE TIME. If you want to see REAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE, properly documented, take a look at all the scientific research that has been published, well documented, peer reviewed, and published BY RESPECTABLE SOURCES (edit) ABOUT CHERNOBYL. (sorry I left that part off).


Show me the same for TMI, Linda - not these 'millions of nut job sources' that google comes up with so easily on TMI - and then we can discuss the possibility that the NRC was TOTALLY CORRUPT in their findings.

Nope - don't buy it, not at all, Linda.

The radiation releases were MINI-SCULE at the time - and NOBODY has EVER proven any differently. A lot of claims and bullshit 'non-documentation' out there - but nothing even in the same ballpark as the quality of info available for Chernobyl.


Don't give a damn about 'millions of hits' - those are easy to get for almost anything - especially something as hyped as TMI has been.

GIVE ME QUALITY - that's what I gave you, Linda.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Really, Linda ?
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Wed, 06 Jun 12 6:52 AM
Msg. 18471 of 21975

Monkey, good evening. Are all these photos photoshopped? p.s. we've had this discussion before. Maniati even said there were fatalities (people) from TMI. I don't recall your debating him. Maybe you weren't around. Anyhow, trillions of hits on google.

Two-Headed Cow A stillborn double headed calf, was stuffed and mounted at the recommendation of the veterinarian. This calf was born a few years after the accident at TMI, on a farm in rural New Cumberland, about 4 ½ to 5 miles northwest of TMI.. Many problems occurred on that farm as well as others in the area. In the spring of 1979, the sheep could not dilate to deliver their lambs. The vet had to perform one or two C-sections a day; prior to the accident he had only one or two a year. The farmer died of thyroid cancer.

Uploaded Image

Uploaded Image

Story:
Three Decades After Accident, Resident Remains in Pursuit of Truth
http://www.tmia.com/node/197

Photo Gallery
http://www.tmia.com/old-website/photos/index.html
Shortcut: click first photo, then click next to save time cycling through the photos

Summary of Findings at Three Mile Island: 1979-2005
http://www.tmia.com/taxonomy/term/18
See info on amount of radiation released within 50 miles
(makes you wonder if that's why US evacuated 50 miles from Fukushima)

Chronology of Health Problems at Three Mile Island
http://www.tmia.com/taxonomy/term/48
One entry: The study actually shows a more than doubling of all observed cancers after the accident at TMI-2, including: lymphoma, leukemia, colon and the hormonal category of breast, endometrium, ovary, prostate and testis. For leukemia and lung cancers in the six to 12 km distance, the number observed was almost four times greater. In the 0-six km range, colon cancer was four times greater. The study found “a statistically significant relationship between incidence rates after the accident and residential proximity to the plant.” (See August, 1996 for Wing Study.)

Uploaded Image


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next