Can't imagine why they put a question mark at the end!
Pro-Obama Media Bias?
Posted: 16 Mar 2012 11:03 AM PDT
http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2012/03/pro-obama_media.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Hyscience+%28Hyscience%29
For the few of you who doubt that the media's in the tank for Obama, if this doesn't convince you ... you're either too biased or too dumb to realize the truth:
[...] A study released by HighBeam Research Friday shows that on one of the biggest nights for the GOP, stories about President Barack Obama grossly outnumbered those focused on the Super Tuesday primaries.
A breakdown of media coverage from Monday, March 5 to Wednesday, March 7 reveals that between the three days, Obama's White House press conference earned 71 percent of the media attention, while Super Tuesday got just 29 percent of the coverage.
[...] The Super Tuesday election coverage was significantly less than in years past, accounting for only 13 percent of the Super Tuesday coverage over the last three cycles.
The 2008 Super Tuesday coverage, when Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were vying for the Democratic nomination, accounted for 67 percent of the coverage. The 2004 coverage, which was just a one-party primary, earned 20 percent of the coverage.
Related:
Bill Clinton admitted Pro-Obama Media Bias
More Evidence of Pro-Obama Mainstream Media Bias
Media Admits Pro-Obama Bias
Reporters Promise To Keep Obama Secrets?
Bernie Goldberg To Bill O'Reilly: 2012 Obama Media Bias Will Be So Subtle Voters 'Will Not Even Catch It'