Replies to Msg. #680289
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
16945 Re: US-Israeli discord...
   lkorrow [b]I don't think that necessarily follows. But it could be re...
ribit   CONSTITUTION   16 Jan 2012
9:57 PM
16930 Re: US-Israeli discord...
   Consider that Obama is in perpetual campaign mode. He wants to appear...
DueDillinger   CONSTITUTION   16 Jan 2012
8:30 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: US-Israeli discord...

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION
Mon, 16 Jan 12 8:19 AM
Msg. 16928 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 16927 by DueDillinger)
Jump to msg. #  

Actually, I heard the Gorenc quote prior.

Then you are equating calling off the exercise with calling off the attack on Iran. I don't think that necessarily follows. But it could be reinforcing the wise premise that Iran should attack first, that we should be provoked and respond.

My point is calling off the exercise could be meaningless. Who needs an exercise? And if it were really happening, I wouldn't use the Israelis on the attack, I'd let them address any problems coming out of Hezbollah in Lebanon, Gaza, etc., while we address the main target.

One item I thought interesting was Turkey's cutting off Iranian shipments to Syria and the US intent to aid Lebanon with its borders. Then, another country stopped a ship with arms.

Are we going after Syria or not? I missed the 60 Minutes segment on Syria with the head of Qatar, who I assume was pushing military action. Maybe the strategy there is just to bleed them of arms to stop the killing. Or prep for more.

Linda




Avatar