Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Hijack 

By: ribit in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 12 Jan 12 6:32 AM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner 		Msg. 16866 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 16850 by lkorrow)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

lkorrow
First, can he do an end run around the election -- kill the election for national security reasons or postpone it while we're at war?

...there have been elections held in every war we have ever been involved in. I suspect there are contingency operations for any such presidential aspirations. The first time I ever heard of the possibility of a prez not steppin down was Clinton, then I heard the libs saying GW wouldn't step down and now Obamba. I suspect Obamba is the most likely to try such a stunt.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Hijack
By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION
Wed, 11 Jan 12 7:43 AM 		Msg. 16850 of 21975

The suggestion was that they'd be looking to run a [probably moderate] conservative-leaning candidate to draw votes from Romney, such that Obama wins.

I now think it's more probable that this is a false flag operation and Obama will use the war with Iran to attempt to stay in office one of two ways.

First, can he do an end run around the election -- kill the election for national security reasons or postpone it while we're at war? And second, the people will not want to change horses in midstream while we are at war. They may not want to take a chance on a new guy. It could push Obama over the top.

Is there any relevant law?

« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next