Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: World Oil Transit Choke Points 

By: RalphOmega in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (2)
Sun, 01 Jan 12 5:28 AM | 58 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner 		Msg. 16707 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 16703 by lkorrow)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Screw you, Linda. Don't make assumptions about my opinions. You consistently mischaracterize Ron Paul's statements based on the tripe you read. Then you imagine what I 'must' be thinking. I don't need this crap.

What part of referring the matter of war to Congress don't you understand? RP supports a STRONG military but rejects its use for 'nationbuilding'. He also rejects the debt-funded boondoggle of military aid. The reality is that our nation is broke and we can't afford to maintain the 'empire'. That doesn't mean however that we have to be weak.


 - - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: World Oil Transit Choke Points
By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 01 Jan 12 4:16 AM 		Msg. 16703 of 21975

Too funny, no nuclear Iran, because of our chickenshit politicians. But it's fine if Ron Paul is that chickenshit politician now, because it was Obama's fault. I'm sorry, but that was pretty funny.

Nothing like going from the frying pan into the fire, although I don't consider Ron Paul to be as dangerous to America as B. Hussein Obama. He might acutally do some good if the Islamists wouldn't walk all over him. I suspect FP would be his undoing.

I think Romney would be a pathetic puppet.

Both of them are concerns, imo.

« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next