« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: $16 Trillion... 

By: DueDillinger in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (3)
Mon, 21 Nov 11 11:10 AM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 16266 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 16265 by DueDillinger)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The Fed Audit

The first top-to-bottom audit of the Federal Reserve uncovered eye-popping new details about how the U.S. provided a whopping $16 trillion in secret loans to bail out American and foreign banks and businesses during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. An amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders to the Wall Street reform law passed one year ago this week directed the Government Accountability Office to conduct the study. "As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," said Sanders. "This is a clear case of socialism for the rich and rugged, you're-on-our-own individualism for everyone else."

Among the investigation's key findings is that the Fed unilaterally provided trillions of dollars in financial assistance to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland, according to the GAO report. "No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president," Sanders said.

The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress also determined that the Fed lacks a comprehensive system to deal with conflicts of interest, despite the serious potential for abuse. In fact, according to the report, the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to employees and private contractors so they could keep investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans. 

For example, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase served on the New York Fed's board of directors at the same time that his bank received more than $390 billion in financial assistance from the Fed. Moreover, JP Morgan Chase served as one of the clearing banks for the Fed's emergency lending programs.

In another disturbing finding, the GAO said that on Sept. 19, 2008, William Dudley, who is now the New York Fed president, was granted a waiver to let him keep investments in AIG and General Electric at the same time AIG and GE were given bailout funds. One reason the Fed did not make Dudley sell his holdings, according to the audit, was that it might have created the appearance of a conflict of interest.

To Sanders, the conclusion is simple. "No one who works for a firm receiving direct financial assistance from the Fed should be allowed to sit on the Fed's board of directors or be employed by the Fed," he said.

The investigation also revealed that the Fed outsourced most of its emergency lending programs to private contractors, many of which also were recipients of extremely low-interest and then-secret loans.

The Fed outsourced virtually all of the operations of their emergency lending programs to private contractors like JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo. The same firms also received trillions of dollars in Fed loans at near-zero interest rates. Altogether some two-thirds of the contracts that the Fed awarded to manage its emergency lending programs were no-bid contracts. Morgan Stanley was given the largest no-bid contract worth $108.4 million to help manage the Fed bailout of AIG.

A more detailed GAO investigation into potential conflicts of interest at the Fed is due on Oct. 18, but Sanders said one thing already is abundantly clear. "The Federal Reserve must be reformed to serve the needs of working families, not just CEOs on Wall Street."

To read the GAO report, click here: http://sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/GAO%20Fed%20Investigation.pdf

http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3

Uploaded Image

∆∆




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
$16 Trillion...
By: DueDillinger
in CONSTITUTION
Mon, 21 Nov 11 10:47 AM
Msg. 16265 of 21975

From today's Hat Trick Letter:

A new amendment to the Dodd-Frank Bill (aka FinReg Bill) forced the first audit ever by the GAO (Government Accountability Office). The added clause with teeth was due to work by Ron Paul, Alan Grayson, Jim DeMint, and Bernie Sanders. USFed Chairman Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and numerous high ranking bankers vehemently opposed the audit. The culpable always object to sunlight. They distorted to the extreme both the financial market effect and the disruption to the power structure. The results of the first audit of the US Federal Reserve was completed in its 100 year history. The financial press did not cover the story. The results were posted on Senator Sander's webpage. [see next post] The audit was startling. Zeros deserve to be shown.

The central bank doled out $16,000,000,000,000 in secret loans to US banks, US corporations, and foreign banks. 

The recipients span the globe from France to Scotland, even Japan. Between December 2007 and June 2010, the USFed conducted hidden bailouts of many of the world's largest banks, corporations, and governments through their central banks. Officially, the center of the Western financial crime syndicate, the US Federal Reserve, refers to these secret bailouts as a comprehensive loan program. Quite the generosity though, since none of the money has been returned, all loaned out at 0% interest. The largesse to the elite and central bank stewards of the monetary system went without notification to the USCongress, while American public has been struggling to find jobs and keep their homes.

One must put the amount in perspective. The size of the USEconomy (its GDP) is $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the USGovt is $14.5 trillion. The annual budget actively debated in Congress is $3.5 trillion. There was no debate over $16 trillion in doled out loans to the elitist system titans and henchmen. The $800 billion TARP Fund as the visible portion to cover executive bonuses and preferred stock for the deeply damaged Wall Street banks. Regard this fund as a total distraction for the big pie, the $16 trillion. Be aware that at the time of the comprehensive loan program, the commodity and equity markets were being actively slammed. Hence, the beneficiaries to the gigantic loans were in a position to do some serious bargain shopping, if not carpetbagging. Details of the charitable elite benevolence will come out. But Citigroup received $2.5 trillion, Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion, and Goldman Sachs received $814 billion. The also-rans were Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, which together walked off with $1 trillion. My theory is simple. These big banks needed huge sums of money for two purposes, to cover their vast derivative losses from the September 2008 collapse, and to invest in the next chapter when assets were intentionally crushed in price. The harsh spotlight is on the USFed and other major banks. They continue the grip of power and holding court before the subservient press. See the Silver Bear Cafe article (http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/10.11/gaoaudit.html).

Really, what is the problem? Maybe the bankers really needed the money. Without generous executive compensation, they cannot attract the best talent. Without ample liquidity, the system's credit apparatus cannot function from seizure. Without coverage of derivative losses, the financial nuclear option would be triggered. Without a grand fix, our system of life and standard of living would deteriorate badly. Yada yada yada. Amazing that so many people believed the nonsense as rationale.

Uploaded Image

∆∆


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next