« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ron Paul to release serious fiscal reform plan... 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (3)
Wed, 19 Oct 11 11:32 AM | 54 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15785 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15776 by DueDillinger)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Don't like a single one of them. Plain and simple.

But then, I am in a pissy mood.

A balanced budget within 'three years' really is not acceptable. It might be 'doable' - but it still is not acceptable.

Personal Savings - what a joke. Until the Fed is halted from the century long gutting of savings through their very deliberate policy of cutting the value of savings in HALF every 6-14 years (sometimes faster) through deliberate inflation - 'personal savings' are financial stupidity - no, correction, financial INSANITY. Ask the East Germans about that.

We have seen a 50% decrease in the PURCHASING POWER of the dollar in the past 3 years alone - Personal Savings have been GUTTED paying for the un-balanced (full range of meanings to that) policies of the FED and the federal government.

The Corporate 'tax rates' and 'capital repatriation' - not going to happen in our life times. Corporations are INDIVIDUALS under the law - and, according to the 14th ammendment - What is being proposed there is strictly UN-Constitutional. Start thinking in that direction - it is an eye opener.

Sarbanes Oxley has ALWAYS been a joke - a very bad joke from day one. The only ones to 'benefit' from it have been the huge corps - where the additional overhead is miniscule - compared to what it does to small and mid sized businesses. Does the 'average American' even KNOW that SO exists, much less what it does ? No.

Congressional Review of 'new regulations' - STILL UN-Constitutional - the power of these 'regulatory' bodies to issue regulations with the force of law belongs SOLELY in the hands of the Congress - that is the FUNCTION of the Congress - legislation. It is NOT the function of the 'executive branch' in any way, shape, form or manner.

As I said - freeping incrementalism. Time to bring the hickory baseball bat out of the closet - and start swinging. Everything else is going to get 'compromised' to death - and we both know it.

I could go on, Due - but, quite frankly - it is a non-starter with me.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Ron Paul to release serious fiscal reform plan...
By: DueDillinger
in CONSTITUTION
Wed, 19 Oct 11 5:36 AM
Msg. 15776 of 21975

Yes. The synopsis isn't by RP and misses key elements. The most important missing point is the goal of a balanced budget within three years.

...or this:

Repeals ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, and Sarbanes-
Oxley
. Mandates REINS-style requirements for
thorough congressional review and authorization
before implementing any new regulations issued by
bureaucrats. President Paul will also cancel all onerous regulations previously issued by Executive Order.

...or this:

Lowers the corporate tax rate to 15%, making
America competitive in the global market. Allows
American companies to repatriate capital without
additional taxation
, spurring trillions in new
investment. Extends all Bush tax cuts. Abolishes the
Death Tax. Ends taxes on personal savings
, allowing
families to build a nest egg.

Here's the entire document. It's an easy read...mostly charts. http://www.ronpaul.com/media/RestoreAmericaPlan.pdf

The field is set now; the candidates you see are all we have. We can easily dismiss RINOS Romney and Perry, and Cain is a bankster shill...so who do you like? Newt? Michele? Rick?

Uploaded Image

∆∆


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next