« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Japan sorely needs bright ideas 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (2)
Thu, 29 Sep 11 8:37 AM | 96 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15401 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15399 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

There really is only ONE 'alternative' energy source that makes sense - and it sure as hell isn't solar or wind. We have pretty well documented the problems with BOTH of those on this board over the years.

The ONE that does make sense, WORKS, is economic - and is absolutely IDEAL for Japan - unlike most other countries and that one is ... hyup, you guessed it, GEOTHERMAL.

Now, those that have followed me over the years know that I raked CALPINE ENERGY over the friggin' coals for their business practices and problems - declaring quite boldly that they would be going into Chapter 11 Bankruptcy at least a full year before that happened. Calpine stock was still a 'darling' of many at that time.

However, the ONE thing I never berated Calpine on was their GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGY, IMPLEMENTATION, and plant generation. If they had stuck to that - they would have been quite profitable, albeit never the 'huge' nyse company that they aspired to become.

THAT TECHNOLOGY is what Japan could use - IMMEDIATELY - to generate more than some insignificant portion of their energy needs - probably close to 80% within two years - if they decided to go that route.

Just my (educated) opinion.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Japan sorely needs bright ideas
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 29 Sep 11 8:10 AM
Msg. 15399 of 21975

They unplugged their heated toilet seats and avoided blackouts.

Japan sorely needs bright ideas

Article by: THE ECONOMIST Updated: September 19, 2011 - 7:21 PM

The country's powerful energy monopolies raise costs and stifle innovation.

http://www.startribune.com/business/130165393.html

The corridors were dark, the air uncomfortably hot. The lights at the headquarters of the Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco) were largely switched off; the air-conditioners were turned down. Even the chief executive, Toshio Nishizawa, had removed his tie for an interview. In normal times, that would be a glaring breach of corporate etiquette, but these are not normal times.

Since the earthquake and tsunami of March 11, most nuclear reactors in Japan have been shut down for maintenance and not restarted: 43 out of 54 remain idle. There has been a national drive for setsuden (conserving energy). Tepco must be seen to share the pain.

The company is staggeringly unpopular. One of its nuclear plants at Fukushima was damaged on March 11. In the crucial hours after the tsunami, Tepco failed to add water to cool the reactor cores. It was unable to restore steady backup power until days later and inexplicably delayed venting a buildup of pressure that led to hydrogen explosions.

As if that were not bad enough, Tepco withheld information from everyone, including the then-prime minister, Naoto Kan, who stormed into its headquarters yelling: "What the hell is going on?" A meltdown began several hours after the tsunami struck, but wasn't officially disclosed until nine weeks later. "We have lost trust," admitted Nishizawa. Regaining it will take "a long, long time," he added.

Asked whether the reactor was damaged by the quake itself (as distinct from the tsunami that followed it), Nishizawa said it is unclear: we must wait for a report in November. This is a key question: If Japan's reactors aren't quake-proof, then none of the country's nuclear plants may be safe. An official at a nuclear regulator says there is evidence that the quake did indeed damage the plant's reactors before the tsunami hit.

Since the disaster, Japan's people have made heroic efforts to save energy. Households snuffed out lights and unplugged their heated toilet seats. Big companies reduced their energy use by 15 percent (on pain of fines). Many began the workday earlier or switched to night shifts. The car industry took Thursdays and Fridays off and toiled on weekends, when electricity demand is lower. In Tepco's region (around Tokyo), peak usage fell to 49 gigawatts, from 60 gigawatts last year. Everyone expected blackouts; none occurred. On Sept. 9, as the summer's heat faded, the government announced an end to setsuden.

Yet Japan's energy problems are far from resolved. If the nuclear freeze lasts for a year, it will cut GDP by an estimated 3.6 percent and destroy almost 200,000 jobs. Meanwhile, three-fifths of the public say they have little confidence in nuclear power.

Japan needs a robust and diverse energy industry. Instead it has 10 regional monopolies (Tepco is one), which hog 97 percent of the market for electricity generation and transmission. Residential consumers pay nearly twice as much as Americans and three times as much as South Koreans.

Electricity prices are high because the monopolies have little incentive to cut costs. On the contrary, their profit margins are fixed by the government, so if they inflate their costs, they boost their income. At the same time, the utilities charge residential consumers a flat rate, giving them no incentive to run appliances during off-peak hours. Alternative energy gets short shrift. Although Japanese firms are leaders in green technologies such as wind, solar and geothermal, these sources account for only 1 percent of the country's power generation.

The new government of Yoshihiko Noda wants to reduce reliance on nuclear power in the medium term, but hopes to restart idle reactors in the meantime. Without cheap, reliable power, businesses may move abroad.

New firms are clamoring to enter the energy business. Masayoshi Son, a wireless tycoon, plans to build huge solar-power stations and a new grid to connect Japanese prefectures. But the regulatory process is a nightmare, he says.

A new law on green energy gives few clues as to how new producers can sell power to the grid, or whether the incumbents have to buy it.

Not even an earthquake, it seems, can shake the monopolists' grip.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next