« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: ribit in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 20 Sep 11 2:26 AM | 73 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15235 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15227 by DGpeddler)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

dgp
...have been deer hunting with smith model 19 with 6 in barrel. Didn't see nary a one.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: DGpeddler
in CONSTITUTION
Tue, 20 Sep 11 12:01 AM
Msg. 15227 of 21975

I liked shooting 38's with a 357 but it had an 8 inch barrel. You could hit a beer bottle at 50 feet but it was heavy and not good for a close up fight.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next