« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

POTD AWARD - Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 20 Sep 11 1:50 AM | 79 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15233 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15228 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ROFLMAO !!!


Quintessential B', there.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: Beldin
in CONSTITUTION
Tue, 20 Sep 11 12:57 AM
Msg. 15228 of 21975

ribit,

My advice to anyone who wants to carry a .25 is ... if you insist on carrying a .25, DO NOT LOAD IT ... you might be tempted to shoot someone with it ... and if you do shoot someone with it, even at point-blank range, you will only succeed in pissing them off that much more and they WILL kill you. As a defensive weapon, you will have a far greater chance of success in defending yourself if you throw the .25 at the head of your attacker than you will have by pulling the trigger. The highest and best use of a .25 is as a weight for your fishing line.

B.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next