Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone 

By: Beldin in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 20 Sep 11 12:57 AM | 94 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner 		Msg. 15228 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15201 by ribit)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ribit,

My advice to anyone who wants to carry a .25 is ... if you insist on carrying a .25, DO NOT LOAD IT ... you might be tempted to shoot someone with it ... and if you do shoot someone with it, even at point-blank range, you will only succeed in pissing them off that much more and they WILL kill you. As a defensive weapon, you will have a far greater chance of success in defending yourself if you throw the .25 at the head of your attacker than you will have by pulling the trigger. The highest and best use of a .25 is as a weight for your fishing line.

B.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: ribit in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 10:11 PM 		Msg. 15201 of 21975

dgp
...the has a bullet of about 45 grains traveling at approx 750 feet per second. The .38 is anywhere from twice to three times the mass. Speed about the same. It's a better bullet. I was just tryin to steer lkorrow away from an auto. It takes a lot of practice to learn to use an auto safely and efficiently.

...a .25 is what I always refer to as a Saturday Night Special. Not good for much but gettin ya in trouble.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next