« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: DGpeddler in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 20 Sep 11 12:01 AM | 87 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15227 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15201 by ribit)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I liked shooting 38's with a 357 but it had an 8 inch barrel. You could hit a beer bottle at 50 feet but it was heavy and not good for a close up fight.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: ribit
in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 10:11 PM
Msg. 15201 of 21975

dgp
...the has a bullet of about 45 grains traveling at approx 750 feet per second. The .38 is anywhere from twice to three times the mass. Speed about the same. It's a better bullet. I was just tryin to steer lkorrow away from an auto. It takes a lot of practice to learn to use an auto safely and efficiently.

...a .25 is what I always refer to as a Saturday Night Special. Not good for much but gettin ya in trouble.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next