Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone 

By: ribit in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (3)
Sun, 18 Sep 11 9:56 PM | 64 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner 		Msg. 15199 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15190 by lkorrow)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

lkorrow
...an old story about WWII. Seems Hitler wanted to use Switzerland for somethin and the Swiss said "NO". Hitler told the swiss king (or whatever) "You only have a half million man army, what will you do if I invade with a million men?"

The Swiss King says, "I will issue each of my men two bullets".




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 9:01 AM 		Msg. 15190 of 21975

ribit, Not to worry, I'll zap 'em with my ray gun. Smile

I feel safer without a weapon and I feel safe here.

Of course there's stuff to grab if you're having a home invasion.

Only reason I thought about it was when one of those emails went around that said something new -- gun ownership in the US deters external enemies from attacking us. How's that for a twist on the theme of protecting yourself!


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next