« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: DGpeddler in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 18 Sep 11 7:12 PM | 78 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15193 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15187 by ribit)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ribit, I just remember that a 25 with a two inch barrel would not penetrate the skin of a hot water heater from about five feet. My 22 put a bullet compleately through it. (I played with a lot of guns when I was in high school, EVERY Sunday afternoon. I made about $30 a week and me and my buddy spent about two grand on guns and ammo in one year. Nice thing about Gallup was you could go five miles in any direction and be far enough out of town to shoot.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: ribit
in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 7:09 AM
Msg. 15187 of 21975

dgp
...it don't need much speed if your within 25 yards. If I wanted speed I would get a 357//


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next