« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Commercial Sources of Oil and Gas info ... 

By: monkeytrots in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Sun, 18 Sep 11 10:41 AM | 90 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15192 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15188 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

no problem - My very firm view is that 99% of what the Federal Government does is illegal - strictly prohibited by the United States Constitution.

Thinking about 're-engineering', or revamping, or making things better has reached the point that it is a major irritant to me - for the simple reason ... it's been tried before, and has always failed - even when declared to be a success. Prime Example: "Contract with America".

The problem is too much centralization of power. As Due observes - other than throwing the whole thing out - I don't see any way of improving the situation.

Way too many 'pockets being lined' involved.

The system is TOTALLY CORRUPTED - and can not be 'remedied' without eliminating the source of the problem - Government doing things - having usurped the power to do those things. Preventing that is for which the Constitution was designed; limits, structure, and balances - that have been disappearing and are, today, almost totally absent - or perverted beyond any semblance of recognizability.

As Brother Bill says, the first step is admitting that we have a problem, and that it is beyond our control.

It truly is time for revolution - hopefully peaceful - but that is highly improbable.




Avatar

Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good ...


- - - - -
View Replies (3) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Commercial Sources of Oil and Gas info ...
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 8:46 AM
Msg. 15188 of 21975

Monkey, I think we I you someone got their wires crossed. I was suggesting or at least what I was thinking about and perhaps didn't convey is a re-engineering of government to get it more aligned with what it should be doing.

We do, however, disagree on energy stats. I don't think certain things vital to the national interests and defense should necessarily be private. But frankly, I'd have to think on it a lot more than I have today.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next