Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 18 Sep 11 9:01 AM | 80 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner 		Msg. 15190 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15186 by ribit)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

ribit, Not to worry, I'll zap 'em with my ray gun. Smile

I feel safer without a weapon and I feel safe here.

Of course there's stuff to grab if you're having a home invasion.

Only reason I thought about it was when one of those emails went around that said something new -- gun ownership in the US deters external enemies from attacking us. How's that for a twist on the theme of protecting yourself!




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: ribit in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 7:08 AM 		Msg. 15186 of 21975

lkorrow
...lots of things make excellent weapons. Folks in prison make em, so Im sure ya could conjur up something that would be practical and efficient.

« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next