« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: DGpeddler in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 18 Sep 11 4:02 AM | 83 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15180 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15174 by ribit)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I found the two inch barrel to be too short to give the bullet much speed.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: ribit
in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 12:22 AM
Msg. 15174 of 21975

lkorrow
...most handguns are for short range. Ya should be able to put a hole in a target at 25 feet without any trouble though. Ya probaly aren't going to need anything any more powerful than that. I carry a similar weapon (S&W Model 15 with a 2 in barrel) It is sufficient for defense and not so cumbersome and heavy that it wears ya out.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next