Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #654710
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
15180 Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
   I found the two inch barrel to be too short to give the bullet much sp... 		DGpeddler   CONSTITUTION   18 Sep 2011
 4:02 AM
15178 Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
   ribit, that would be more than enough if someone were in the house att... 		lkorrow   CONSTITUTION   18 Sep 2011
 3:20 AM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: ribit in CONSTITUTION
Sun, 18 Sep 11 12:22 AM
Msg. 15174 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15148 by lkorrow)
Jump to msg. #  

lkorrow
...most handguns are for short range. Ya should be able to put a hole in a target at 25 feet without any trouble though. Ya probaly aren't going to need anything any more powerful than that. I carry a similar weapon (S&W Model 15 with a 2 in barrel) It is sufficient for defense and not so cumbersome and heavy that it wears ya out.


Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!