« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone 

By: ribit in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Fri, 16 Sep 11 7:46 AM | 89 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15118 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15103 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

lkorrow

http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&rlz=&q=lady+smith&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=shop&cid=18218185994676254291&sa=X&ei=VMxyTs2mCseWtwfSk9iyDA&ved=0CCkQ8gIwAA#





Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 15 Sep 11 7:26 PM
Msg. 15103 of 21975

I'm not too inclined to go that route, it's pretty safe around here. But if bad things develop in the future, is a Glock .40 what every toting woman should carry?


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next