« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 16 Sep 11 5:07 AM | 84 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15112 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15104 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

You won't believe this. Was talking to the guy behind the deli counter in the village and he said bad sorts have been hanging out around the supermarket and at the bar across the street. Some 6 stores are vacant in Town (not including Border's closing). And someone was knifed at or outside the bar by a gang member. Needless to say, I have NEVER heard of a gang oout here.

Maybe such problems are closer than I thought. I don't like the trend.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: Beldin
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 15 Sep 11 7:57 PM
Msg. 15104 of 21975

A Glock .40 is one of the good options, among many, yes.


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next