« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: Beldin in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 15 Sep 11 7:57 PM | 92 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15104 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15103 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

A Glock .40 is one of the good options, among many, yes.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 15 Sep 11 7:26 PM
Msg. 15103 of 21975

I'm not too inclined to go that route, it's pretty safe around here. But if bad things develop in the future, is a Glock .40 what every toting woman should carry?


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next