Replies to Msg. #654168
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
15118 Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
   lkorrow http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&rlz=&q=lady+sm...
ribit   CONSTITUTION   16 Sep 2011
7:46 AM
15104 Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
   A Glock .40 is one of the good options, among many, yes.
Beldin   CONSTITUTION   15 Sep 2011
7:57 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 15 Sep 11 7:26 PM
Msg. 15103 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15097 by Beldin)
Jump to msg. #  

I'm not too inclined to go that route, it's pretty safe around here. But if bad things develop in the future, is a Glock .40 what every toting woman should carry?




Avatar