« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 15 Sep 11 7:26 PM | 94 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 15103 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 15097 by Beldin)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I'm not too inclined to go that route, it's pretty safe around here. But if bad things develop in the future, is a Glock .40 what every toting woman should carry?




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By: Beldin
in CONSTITUTION
Thu, 15 Sep 11 8:34 AM
Msg. 15097 of 21975

Of course it is time to buy a gun ... and ammunition ... and training if you don't already know how to use it properly ... and regular practice at the range ... and the willingness and resolve to aim and pull the trigger when necessary. The police department ... and the government ... does not exist to keep each and every one of us safe from every harm that can befall us - and they couldn't even if they wanted to do so, period. Each citizen needs to take primary responsibility for their own safety and the safety of their family members.

"You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a deranged looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock .40 and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do?"

Liberal's Answer:

Well, that's not enough information to answer the question! Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to
attack? Could we run away? What does my wife think? What about the kids? Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand? What does the law say about this situation? Does the Glock have an appropriate safety built into it? Why am I carrying a loaded gun and what kind of message does this send to society and my children? Is it possible he'd be happy with just killing me? Does he definitely want to kill me or would he just be content to wound me? If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me? This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some friends for a few days to try to come to a conclusion.

Conservative's Answer:

BANG!

Texan's Answer:

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click ... (sounds of reloading).

Wife: "Sweetheart, he looks like he's still moving, what do you kids think?"

Son: "Mom's right Dad, I saw it too..."

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
click.

Daughter: "Nice group, Daddy! Were those the Winchester Silver Tips?"


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next