« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Been told many times before... 

By: lkorrow in CONSTITUTION | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 06 Sep 11 6:24 AM | 51 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Constitutional Corner
Msg. 14904 of 21975
(This msg. is a reply to 14894 by lkorrow)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

A footnote: as most here know, I staunchly defended GWB, going into Iraq, etc. So I find it hard to believe he'd be engaged in a plot to usher in a caliphate. After all, he was the one going after the 'terrorists.' But he did say he'd take down America on tv and not one of the people around him even looked up. And he kept Condi Rice around. It's a long stretch to think he's involved in such a plot.

Pataki and Bloomberg, however, were both for that International Freedom Center instead of a 9/11 memorial. So many things beg the question, what the hay's going on? Who's in, who's out, who's an unknowing agent if deception's in progress.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Been told many times before...
By: lkorrow
in CONSTITUTION
Mon, 05 Sep 11 11:40 PM
Msg. 14894 of 21975

I have this sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach.

There seemed to be reasonable doubt that the 'Spring' -- our supporting opposition was innocent in nature. But, that likelihood appears to be rapidly diminishing.

Now going back to after Obummer was elected, I saw something that said Obummer was an outsider, but bought intoi the program. I wish I could remember where I saw it, but I thought it was the globalists.

Then, GWB had cleaned house at the CIA. It would be qite interesting to note whether those fired/retired were those who were for having our dictators, vs. the GW's freedom movement, which could well be an enslavement movement, consistent with this article.

It's been well known that elections produce Islamist regimes, going back to the Palestinian elections, which I think were the first. The mantra was elections might not work at first, but the people would wake up and smell the roses and vote out the Islamists. That's clearly not what happens. Once they're Islamist, the people are massively suppressed.

Now we see Obama marching forward killing regimes favorable tot he US, it would seem. I had said what was it that Gadaffi did to bring on a war against him. Then I saw, too, that he was a CIA asset. So, why? Had he actually proceeded with his nuclear program or actually produced the Arab bomb? Well, now, there's reason to believe Gadaffi could be being taken out because he IS a friend to the US.

How creepy is that?


« CONSTITUTION Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next