Perry's being pushed as a (ahem) conservative alternative to the RINO from Mass. I googled 'do not trust Rick Perry' and the former-Democrat/neocon/Bilderberg/globalist characterizations jumped right off the page and set me to exploring further.
Here's a snippet of an article from last year by the author of the Perry piece I posted, Jay Valentine:
It is time we realize that there are "movement conservatives" and there are opportunistic conservatives. Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, and a host of emerging new candidates are movement conservatives.
What is different about them is they are conservative in their core, not in their clothing. When times get tough for conservatives, nothing changes. So when times get better, they aren't likely to compromise.
People amazingly recall Reagan today as a "great president." Not Bush, not Nixon, just Reagan. Well, let us recall why -- he was the only movement conservative elected in the last fifty years. Reagan was great because he was a movement conservative; he never did anything just to get along or get elected.
The changes needed in America today are not a matter of degree; they are a matter of kind. The entire American mindset must fundamentally change away from democratic socialism and toward individual self-reliance.
That mindset is changing. The political class, however, is not.
The changes needed in America require saying "no" in a big way and being vilified in the press. Our leaders need to be able to stand up to massive left-wing media resistance and not compromise the core.
This can be done only by a movement conservative.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/rolling_the_conservative_movem.html
∆∆
| 
